Trump's New Executive Order Sparks Controversy on Detaining Migrants at Guantanamo Bay

In a move that has reignited intense debate, former President Donald Trump has issued a new executive order, calling for the preparation of a detention facility at Guantanamo Bay to accommodate up to 30,000 migrants. This decision, which expands the infamous Cuban detention center, has drawn significant criticism from human rights organizations and political figures alike.

Trump announced on Wednesday (January 29) that the US government would be expanding the existing structures at Guantanamo Bay, historically criticized for allegations of torture and human rights abuses. He stated, "Today, I’m signing an executive order to instruct the departments of defense and homeland security to begin preparing the 30,000-person migrant facility at Guantanamo Bay."

The notorious Guantanamo Bay site is divided into two sections: a prison for foreign terrorism suspects and a migrant facility. The latter has previously been utilized to house refugees from Haiti and Cuba. Accounts from the Guantanamo Public Memory Project reveal past instances of harsh conditions, including reports from Haitian refugees in the 1990s who faced overcrowding, solitary confinement, and degrading treatment.

Protests and Political Response

On January 11, 2025, a group of peace activists gathered in front of the New York Public Library to protest the expansion of Guantanamo Bay as a detention camp for migrants. This move by Trump, which he says is aimed at detaining "the worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people," has sparked widespread backlash.

Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, confirmed that the expanded facility would be overseen by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. However, many see this step as a deepening of the controversial legacy associated with Guantanamo Bay, which has been a site connected to allegations of torture and indefinite detention without due process since its establishment in 2002 by former President George W. Bush.

Guantanamo Bay has housed a total of 780 prisoners since 2002, although the number of detainees currently stands at 15. Efforts by former presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden to close the facility were met with significant political challenges, and Trump's latest executive order has been viewed as a reversal of these efforts.

Opposition from Human Rights Groups and Politicians

Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International USA, have been vocal in their criticism. Amnesty International referred to Guantanamo Bay as "the site of torture, indefinite detention without charge or trial and other unlawful practices by the US government." They expressed disappointment in Trump’s decision, urging instead for the prison’s closure.

This sentiment was echoed by political figures, with Cuba's president, Miguel Diaz-Canel, condemning the move as "an act of brutality." Rashida Tlaib, a Democratic congresswoman, described the executive order as horrific, emphasizing the dehumanization it represents and calling for the closure of Guantanamo Bay "once and for all."

US Representative Jerry Nadler also weighed in, describing the detention center as a "stain on our nation’s honor," highlighting the ongoing abuses and lack of accountability as reasons for its closure. Nadler argued that the expansion is "morally indefensible" and poses significant threats to civil liberties.

In addition to the controversy surrounding Guantanamo Bay, Trump's administration has faced criticism for executive orders perceived as targeting the LGBTQ+ community, affecting aspects such as gender-affirming care, military service for transgender individuals, and the use of "X" gender markers on official documents.

Continuing the Conversation

The decision to expand the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay continues to spark discussions about human rights, immigration, and the moral responsibilities of governments. As the debate unfolds, it is crucial to consider the implications of such actions on civil liberties and human dignity.

We invite you to share your thoughts on this topic. Engage in the conversation below, and let’s ensure that discussions remain respectful and constructive.