I know firsthand what it's like when decisions about my body were made without my informed consent, all under this idea that it was somehow "protecting children." As a kid, adults and doctors decided things about my body not because it was an emergency, but because they weren't comfortable with my natural differences. The real issue? Society and medical norms pressuring everyone, including me, back then, that everything has gotta fit neatly in a male-female box. That's where all this started—not with who I am deep down.>
We're seeing a similar hypocrisy play out across America, right from local governments up through Congress. For years, intersex kids—that's those born with unique sex characteristics—have undergone medical procedures without specific laws backing it. Now, there's this new wave where laws are popping up against gender-affirming care specifically targeting transgender youth. These laws, which House Republicans are championing, mean serious trouble and heavy penalties just because someone wants proper care. It all masquerades as "protecting children," but really, it's using laws against families and healthcare providers that help these young folks.>
On top, hospitals and insurers are using policy changes as a weapon, trying hard nationwide, restricting gender-affirming care. Fear around losing federal funds or facing lawsuits makes offering such care seem too risky. So, what happens? These kids lose out on important care that plenty in major medical communities actually support.>
We're hearing these actions defended as a means against "irreversible harm." But if they really cared about that, we'd see lawmakers addressing those unnecessary surgeries on intersex infants first. Human rights organizations have been pointing out these surgeries, which are not about medical need but about making bodies fit traditional male or female appearances. There are still states that allow these surgeries while banning care that supports transgender teens, as JAMA Health Forum has shown. It's like playing favorites with such serious matters.>
This mess isn't by accident. If these laws were truly about keeping kids safe, wouldn't intersex kids be protected most? Right now, rules aim at trans youth while allowing life-altering surgeries on intersex kids. These kids disrupt that rigid sex and gender mold—but that tension seems intentional on lawmakers' parts.>
Intersex voices often get lost unless they're twisted around in these harmful laws' conversations. It's all about control when they say "protecting children," yet support practices stripping intersex kids' rights and choices, which are supposed lifelong impacts on them.>
It's a critical time as our federal government finally starts recognizing intersex issues. In 2024, President Biden's administration made history with an intersex health equity report. This document calls out past healthcare system failings and suggests delaying surgeries until people can actually decide about their own bodies.>
Still, it feels like we're moving backward. Look at Trump's first executive order trying hard erasing trans and intersex folks by narrowing what "sex" means legally.>
Using medicine wrongly as an eraser gets labeled protection while genuine self-understanding support turns threatening. But really, this isn't just healthcare but a control struggle.>
America can't pretend it stands against irreversible child harm while it legally allows condemned surgeries on intersex people. True respect means everyone's bodily autonomy counts, not just fitting someone's comfort zone.>
Protecting kids truly means making safe spaces—trans, intersex, cisgender—all deserve that. It calls us all towards delaying unnecessary, irreversible steps, fostering trust, and focusing on families' and kids' voices—beyond culture wars.>
So, America stands at a choice: shamefully continue criminalizing genuine care or listen close and learn from those bearing these impacts. Intersex children need true legal protection, not harmful political games undermining who they are.>
This piece comes from Kimberly Zieselman, a human rights advocate who penned "XOXY: A Memoir" and contributed significantly in analyzing these restrictive laws through JAMA Health Forum.>
The political landscape in Alexandria, Virginia, is witnessing a remarkable event as two openly gay candidates, Kirk McPike and Gregory Darrall, vie for a seat in the Virginia House of Delegates. The primary, scheduled for January 20th, is a pivotal step in selecting the Democratic nominee for the upcoming special election on February 10th. This election aims to fill the vacancy left by Delegate E [...]
Community Leader Faces Job Loss Over Pronoun Policy In a recent incident highlighting the ongoing discussions around gender identity and workplace inclusion, a community leader in Louisiana has been dismissed from their position after refusing to use a co-worker's specified pronouns. This decision has sparked a broader conversation on the balance between personal beliefs and professional responsib [...]
In a concerning development, Arizona state Representative John Gillette has come under fire for his controversial social media post, calling for the execution of U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal. On September 25, Gillette, a Republican known for his anti-LGBTQ+ stance, made a post on the social platform X, responding to a right-wing social media account known as The Patriot Oasis. The post by [...]