Rutger published: LGBTQ Landmark Study Removed from National Park Service Website

The removal of a significant 2016 theme study, which shed light on the history of the LGBTQ community, from the National Park Service (NPS) website has caused considerable alarm within the community. The study, recognized as a groundbreaking work, has been a pivotal resource in acknowledging the contributions of LGBTQ individuals in American history.

Recently, the NPS faced directives to eliminate the terms "T" and "Q" from "LGBTQ" in all internal and external communications. This instruction led to a significant backlash, particularly when transgender references were removed from the Stonewall National Monument’s webpage.

An internal conflict emerged regarding the fate of the LGBTQ Theme Study. Some political appointees under the Trump administration called for the removal of transgender content, while some NPS staff argued against altering the document, which would undermine the study's academic integrity. Eventually, the decision was made to remove the entire study, a move seen by many as deeply troubling.

The LGBTQ Theme Study came about in response to a 2014 grant from the Gill Foundation to the NPS, which aimed to rectify the lack of historic LGBTQ sites in national records. This initiative culminated in the 2016 publication of a comprehensive study, marking a significant step forward for the LGBTQ community in gaining recognition within the broader tapestry of American history.

The study, titled "LGBTQ America: A Theme Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer History," was described as a publication produced by the National Park Foundation for the NPS, funded by the Gill Foundation. Each chapter was authored and peer-reviewed by experts in LGBTQ Studies, ensuring its scholarly credibility.

Impact of Removal

The removal of the theme study has sparked fears that future initiatives to recognize LGBTQ monuments and projects may be jeopardized. When contacted for comment, the National Park Service cited adherence to an executive order issued during the Trump administration, which sought to "Defend Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restore Biological Truth to the Federal Government." This order, along with agency directives to halt all Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, was given as the rationale for the study's removal.

Marc Stein, director of OutHistory, a public history website dedicated to generating evidence-based LGBTQ research, expressed profound concern in a detailed statement following the removal. He highlighted the historical marginalization of LGBTQ histories, stating, "Our histories have been appropriated, censored, commodified, distorted, erased, falsified, marginalized, pathologized, rejected, silenced, and simplified."

Stein's statement underscored the resilience and continuing struggles of the LGBTQ community: "They think they can erase trans and queer people from history, remove trans women of color from the history of Stonewall, pretend that LGBTQ+ people did not exist, did not struggle, did not fight, did not suffer, did not survive, did not thrive. If they think any of this, they have never experienced or witnessed our perseverance, our rage, our resilience, our joy."

A Call to Action

The removal of the LGBTQ Theme Study is seen by many advocates as a call to action to resist attempts at erasure and to continue the fight for recognition and inclusion. The study itself was more than a collection of historic data; it was a testament to the progress made by those in the LGBTQ community striving for visibility and acceptance.

Activists and historians alike are calling for the reinstatement of the study and are urging the public to engage with and support efforts to document and celebrate LGBTQ history. The theme study was a tool for education and awareness, intended to elevate the stories of those who have been historically silenced.

This incident highlights the ongoing challenges faced by marginalized groups in preserving their histories against political pressures that seek to render them invisible. It is a reminder of the importance of continued advocacy and vigilance in the face of efforts to undermine efforts towards equity and representation.

The removal of the LGBTQ Theme Study from the National Park Service website represents not just the loss of a document, but a larger struggle for historical recognition and the fight against erasure. The community's response seeks to ensure that the legacy of LGBTQ contributions is not only remembered but also celebrated for future generations.

Author

Rutger

Like
Bookmark
Comment

Related Posts

Discussion on Queer History Between Drag Legends

Connecting Generations: A Dialogue on Queer History In a vibrant exchange of ideas and experiences, rising teen drag queen Cherry West and renowned performer Dita Garbo delve into the rich tapestry of LGBTQ+ history. This enlightening conversation highlights the importance of remembering the past and educating the future, ensuring that the strides made by the LGBTQ+ community are never forgotten. [...]

Pedro Pascal Advocates for Trans Rights with Powerful Message: "Progress Will Prevail"

Renowned actor Pedro Pascal has once again expressed his unwavering support for the transgender community, highlighting that "progress is inevitable." Known for his roles in popular series like "The Last of Us," Pascal has consistently championed the rights of transgender individuals, notably through his support of his trans sister, Lux. In the face of recent political challenges, including a ser [...]

Join Our Welcoming LGBTQ+ Support Group at the Collingswood Senior Community Center

At the heart of Collingswood, New Jersey, an open and supportive environment awaits all members of the LGBTQ+ community. We are thrilled to invite you to our monthly support group meeting held at the Collingswood Senior Community Center. Whether you identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or are simply an ally to the community, you are welcome to join us at this safe space where yo [...]

Want to write an article or get interviewed?