Susan Crawford Secures Wisconsin Supreme Court Victory: Implications for LGBTQ+ Rights

The votes are in from Wisconsin, and Judge Susan Crawford has clinched a decisive win in a heated race that had everyone talking about its sky-high costs. As one observer put it, this was not your average judicial election. Crawford faced off against Brad Schimel and came out on top, despite Schimel having some pretty high-profile support from none other than Elon Musk. With Crawford's victory, Wisconsin's Supreme Court keeps its narrow 4-3 liberal majority, which could have big implications on hot-button issues like abortion rights and protections around LGBTQ+ rights.

Inside Wisconsin's heated Supreme Court race

Wisconsin's latest Supreme Court election wasn't just any election—it was a spectacle, marked by unprecedented spending and a lineup featuring influential backers. The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign flagged it as perhaps one, if not *the*, costliest judicial race in U.S. history. It was certainly an election that had many keenly focused on its outcome.

Elon Musk, yeah, that Elon Musk, poured over $20 million in support behind Schimel. But guess what? Instead, it fired up Crawford's supporters. They rallied, seeing Musk's financial involvement as an audacious attempt at swaying justice with deep pockets.

Why LGBTQ+ rights hang in balance

One big takeaway from Crawford's triumph lies in its ramifications on LGBTQ+ rights. Wisconsin's Supreme Court plays a pivotal role and its decisions can deeply affect civil liberties, especially those concerning LGBTQ+ communities.

While Crawford hasn't explicitly championed LGBTQ+ issues in past campaigns, her legal track record shows a relentless pursuit toward fairness and justice. Speaking with PBS Wisconsin, she carefully touched on transgender rights, stressing her commitment: “If a case about trans rights comes before me, my role will be clear: scrutinize existing laws and evaluate each side's arguments. It's my job as a justice, above all, that everyone gets their rights respected according with our laws.”

Different views on civil rights

Crawford's outlook starkly opposes that held by her rival, Brad Schimel, known mostly as an opponent against LGBTQ+ rights. During his run at being attorney general, he was firm on preserving Wisconsin's same-sex marriage ban and was hesitant when it came down on offering domestic partnership benefits.

His commentary on cases such as Masterpiece Cakeshop, where a bakery refused service based on sexual orientation, sent ripples through communities, particularly when he equated same-sex couples with Nazi skinheads. LGBTQ+ groups weren't impressed, with Fair Wisconsin raising alarms: Schimel's ascent could very well threaten equality rights.

What's ahead in Wisconsin's courts?

With Judge Susan Crawford stepping in come August 1, 2025, her backers are hopeful she's heralding a fresh wave—one marked by justice and consideration toward individual rights. Although not vocal on LGBTQ+ rights, her devotion suggests a more inclusive bench in dealing with future cases.

Crawford's triumph isn't just a win on paper. It's grassroot power versus big money. It shows judicial elections aren't just about who's most funded—they profoundly influence citizens' everyday lives.

Moving forward, Wisconsin's Supreme Court decisions will undoubtedly forge its legal path, impactful in shaping lives, especially those within marginalized groups. All eyes will be on Crawford, eager observers awaiting her judicial compass' direction.

Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images