Rutger published: Supreme Court to Hear Case Affecting ACA's Preventive Care Protections

The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear a pivotal case that could impact key components of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), particularly its preventive care mandates. This provision under the ACA obligates insurance providers to cover various preventive services, including medications like pre-exposure prophylactics (PrEP) that significantly reduce HIV transmission risks, as well as a broad range of other health services such as cancer screenings and cholesterol-lowering treatments.


The case, initiated by a group of individuals and a Texas-based business named Braidwood Management, challenges the requirement to provide these preventive services. The group, citing moral objections, particularly opposes the coverage of PrEP and screenings for sexually transmitted infections, arguing that these measures promote behaviors they consider objectionable.


Braidwood Management is a for-profit entity owned by a trust with Dr. Steven F. Hotze, a religious Christian, acting as the trustee and beneficiary. Represented by Gene Hamilton and Jonathan Mitchell, both with ties to the Trump administration, Braidwood contends that the ACA’s mandates infringe upon their religious beliefs and constitutional rights.


The legal contention extends to the role of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which recommends these preventive services. Braidwood argues that the task force, not being appointed by the Senate, operates in violation of the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Moreover, they claim that the requirement to cover PrEP impinges on their religious freedoms as protected by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.


This case, known as Braidwood Management Inc. v. Becerra, has already seen a series of decisions in lower courts, leading to its current hearing in the Supreme Court. Previous rulings by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals have sided with Braidwood, restricting the preventive care mandate solely for them. However, both the federal government and the plaintiffs acknowledge that this ruling could set a precedent, enabling others to challenge the ACA nationwide.


Preventive care, as outlined in the ACA, includes a multitude of services beyond PrEP, such as prenatal vitamins, fall prevention therapies for seniors, and lung cancer screenings—services the Biden administration argues are vital for saving thousands of lives annually.


PrEP plays a critical role in the ongoing battle against HIV, both in the United States and globally. It has been instrumental in lowering HIV and STI transmission rates significantly. While PrEP does not prevent other sexually transmitted infections, individuals using PrEP are more likely to undergo regular health screenings, leading to earlier detection and treatment of STIs.


The Supreme Court’s decision to hear this case comes after the U.S. Solicitor General, Elizabeth Prelogar, urged the court to review the 5th Circuit's ruling. She emphasized that the decision threatens established healthcare protections enjoyed by millions of Americans over the past 14 years and could potentially dismantle critical parts of the ACA.


In her appeal, Prelogar stated, “This Court’s review is warranted because the court of appeals has held an Act of Congress unconstitutional and its legal rationale would inflict immense practical harms.” She further highlighted that the appellate court's decision risks disrupting a key segment of the ACA, which provides essential healthcare protections.


The outcome of this case is set to have profound implications not only on the ACA’s future but also on the accessibility of preventive healthcare services across the country. With a decision expected by the end of the Supreme Court's term in June, healthcare providers, policy makers, and millions of Americans are closely monitoring the developments.


Stay informed about the issues that impact your community by subscribing to our newsletter. Keep connected and be the first to know about the latest developments affecting LGBTQ+ communities worldwide.

Author

Rutger

Like
Bookmark
Comment

Related Posts

Anna Camp Wows Fans with Dual Role in You Season 5

Penn Badgley returns to the streets of New York in the much-anticipated fifth and final season of Netflix’s You, and one actress’s standout performance is leaving fans in awe. Anna Camp takes on a challenging dual role that has viewers buzzing with admiration. Warning: Spoilers Ahead for Seasons Four and Five The series follows the tumultuous journey of Joe Goldberg, portrayed by Badgley, a [...]

Transgender Athlete Sadie Schreiner Faces Unjust Criticism in Track and Field

Until the recent USATF New York Masters Indoor Track and Field Championships, the local USA Track and Field open masters meet seldom drew much attention outside of its immediate community. However, this changed dramatically last weekend when certain media outlets seized the opportunity to unfairly target Sadie Schreiner, a talented transgender athlete, who competed in the event following all the e [...]

Controversy in Florida as GOP Event Features Dubious Speakers

In a significant and troubling event that has sparked outrage across political and social spheres, Andrew Tate, a figure known for his far-right views and controversial statements, along with his brother Tristan, made an appearance in the United States. Their visit was facilitated by the Tampa Bay Young Republicans amidst their ongoing legal battles in Romania and the UK for serious charges includ [...]

Want to write an article or get interviewed?