Mississippi Supreme Court Denies Name Change for Transgender Teen

The Mississippi Supreme Court has recently issued a ruling that prevents a young transgender boy from legally changing his name to align with his gender identity until he reaches 21 years of age. This decision comes even though the boy, identified by the initials S.M-B, had the full consent and support of both his parents for the name change. The court justified their decision by citing the boy’s "lack of maturity," despite the fact that Mississippi law permits 15-year-olds to marry with parental consent.

Background of the Case

S.M-B attempted to change his name in July 2023 when he was 16 years old. Under Mississippi law, minors can legally change their names if both parents agree, which was the case for S.M-B. However, his petition was denied by the Hinds County Chancery Court, which argued that the name change was not in the boy’s "best interest." This decision highlights the subjective nature of such judgments, which can be influenced by biases, including transphobic sentiments.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) took up S.M-B’s case, filing an appeal under the name S.M.-B. v. Mississippi State Board of Health. The ACLU's argument was that the denial of the name change was unwarranted and that the chancellor had overstepped by dismissing the unanimous consent of the parents without any evidence that the name change would harm S.M-B.

Supreme Court's Ruling

In an 8-1 decision, the Mississippi Supreme Court upheld the chancery court's ruling. Unfortunately, the court also misgendered S.M-B throughout their opinion, further reflecting the insensitivity and potential bias underlying the decision. The court’s majority opinion emphasized the supposed "lack of maturity" of minors, aligning their reasoning with the state’s public policy against minors receiving any form of gender-transition assistance. This reasoning is anchored in the REAP Act, a 2023 law in Mississippi that bans both surgical and non-surgical gender-related treatments for minors.

Justice Leslie King was the only dissenting voice in this ruling. He criticized the inclusion of the REAP Act as irrelevant to this case, pointing out that there were no medical procedures involved in S.M-B’s name change request. Justice King argued that the chancery court’s decision process was flawed, noting that no evidence was presented and no testimonies from family members were heard.

Impact of the Decision

Due to this ruling, S.M-B, who is currently 18, must wait until he turns 21 in 2028 to legally change his name in Mississippi. This decision has sparked outrage and criticism, highlighting what many see as a hypocritical stance by the Mississippi Supreme Court. Critics point out the contradiction in the state’s laws, where young teenagers can marry but cannot make decisions about their own identity such as a legal name change.

S. Baum, in their commentary, highlights the disparity in Mississippi’s legal policies, noting that child marriage remains legal, with documented consequences such as higher rates of domestic abuse for those who marry as minors. The decision against S.M-B’s name change is criticized not only for its impact on the young man’s life but also for ignoring the benefits of gender-affirming actions, which are well-documented to improve mental health and wellbeing in transgender individuals.

Those affected by similar issues should know that support is available. The Trans Lifeline Hotline offers confidential assistance to transgender and nonbinary individuals struggling with mental health challenges. They can be reached at (877) 565-8860 from 10 A.M. to 6 P.M. PST Monday through Friday.

Stay informed about issues affecting LGBTQ+ communities by subscribing to our newsletter, where you can receive updates on important news and insights.