Recently leaked documents from the Labour Party have revealed plans to postpone the Women's Conference and restrict positive action provisions to 'biological women' following a recent Supreme Court ruling on gender. These plans have been met with strong condemnation from LGBT+ groups within the party, who see them as a direct attack on trans rights.
The confidential advice, sent to members of the National Executive Committee (NEC)—Labour's governing body which includes leader Keir Starmer and chair Ellie Reeves—was leaked online and quickly circulated on social media. The documents propose two options for the NEC's vote, urging the postponement of the women's conference and adopting party rules and procedures based on 'biological sex at birth'.
In April, the UK Supreme Court ruled in the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers, interpreting the protected characteristic of 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act as biological, thereby excluding trans individuals from this definition. This ruling is anticipated to have significant implications for the trans community and organizations that may need to revise policies on single-sex spaces and inclusion.
Following the ruling, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issued interim guidance suggesting that trans people be banned from using single-sex facilities that match their gender, and in certain cases, even those that match their 'biological sex'.
In response to the ruling, demonstrators gathered outside the EHRC in Glasgow, Scotland to voice their disapproval.
The leaked documents recommend that the NEC vote to postpone the National Women's Conference due to the "significant risk of a legal challenge" if it were to proceed with self-ID policies, citing potential protests and security risks. Additionally, Labour would face "significant risk of direct and indirect discrimination claims" if it continues with positive action measures based on self-identification.
The NEC is urged to use a biological definition of 'sex' as a precaution against legal challenges. The documents suggest issuing guidance to party units and stakeholders, acknowledging the judgment's impact on many individuals affected by the changes.
Moreover, the documents recommend postponing the women's conference due to "legal and political risks," indicating that the only legally defensible alternative would be to restrict attendance to those biologically female at birth.
In a joint statement, LGBT+ Labour, Labour for Trans Rights, and Pride in Labour condemned the proposals "unreservedly," criticizing them for potentially restricting trans members' engagement in democratic processes. They argue that excluding trans women from the Women's Conference is not a proportionate means to a legitimate aim, as it removes trans people from debates on issues directly affecting them.
The groups called on NEC members to reject the proposals, emphasizing the underrepresentation of trans people in British politics and the potential harm this decision could cause.
"Equality and positive action are about increasing diversity and access," the statement read. "There are no trans or gender non-conforming MPs, and our community is underrepresented across all levels of government."
The Labour Women's Declaration, a gender-critical Labour organization, labeled the potential postponement as a "knee jerk reaction," warning against canceling a major policy-making conference focused on women's issues. They argued that the party should not succumb to threats of protests, having held similar meetings under threat of violence from trans activists in the past.
A spokesperson expressed disappointment that Labour might prevent hundreds of women from attending the conference instead of excluding trans-identified men, urging the party to adhere to its legislative history and ensure the conference proceeds as planned.
Labour has stated it respects the Supreme Court's judgment and will comply with statutory guidance once available. Ministers will consider the EHRC's upcoming draft Code of Practice, which will reflect the court's ruling.
The EHRC announced a public consultation to update its Code of Practice, aiming to support organizations in understanding their duties under the Equality Act. Initially scheduled for two weeks, the consultation was extended to six weeks due to public interest and feedback from stakeholders.
The consultation will launch on May 19 and conclude on June 30, focused on incorporating the Supreme Court's ruling into practical guidance for service providers and public bodies.
On June 20, D.C. Congressional Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton put forward her bill once again, aiming to eliminate discrimination against LGBTQ individuals in the jury selection process at the D.C. Superior Court. This legislation, if passed, would mark a significant step in ensuring equality and fairness within the judicial system for the LGBTQ community in the District of Columbia. Details of t [...]
In a historic and celebratory move for LGBTQ+ representation, a prominent magazine has featured its first openly lesbian model on its cover. This significant step marks a moment of pride and visibility for the LGBTQ+ community, highlighting the ongoing progress towards diversity and inclusion in mainstream media. The model, who has been a vocal advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, graces the cover with co [...]
The 2025 QWI Awards, an event celebrating the excellence and achievements in the queer professional wrestling community, unveiled its winners on Christmas Day. This year, the spotlight was on the former four-time All Elite Wrestling Women’s World Champion, Toni Storm, who emerged as a major winner. For the second consecutive year, Toni Storm was ranked number two in the QWI 200 but this year sh [...]