Rutger published: Controversy Surrounds Meta: Allegations of Auto-Following Trump and Vance

Meta, the parent company of social media giants Facebook and Instagram, is currently facing scrutiny over allegations that it is "forcing" users to follow the social media pages of President Donald Trump and Vice-President JD Vance. Meta has firmly denied these claims, insisting that no such auto-follow mechanism has been implemented.

Recently, users of Facebook and Instagram have voiced concerns that their accounts are automatically following the pages of Trump and Vance. Many users, including prominent figures like singer Demi Lovato, have reported that after they manually unfollow these pages, their accounts seemingly refollow them without their consent, often within a few hours.

As President Trump’s inauguration on January 20th approached, users also noticed that the hashtag associated with the Democratic Party appeared to be blocked on these platforms. Instead of posts and content, an automatic message stating "we’ve hidden these results" was displayed.

Earlier in the month, Meta made headlines with its decision to discontinue fact-checking programs and moderation of certain sensitive topics such as immigration and gender. This move has sparked further debate about Meta's role in shaping public discourse.

Meta's Response to Allegations

Andy Stone, Meta's communications director, addressed these allegations on X (formerly Twitter), a platform owned by Elon Musk, a known donor to Trump. Stone explained that the accounts in question are managed by the White House and undergo changes when there is a change in administration. "The accounts transition when the occupant of the White House changes," Stone stated.

Despite this explanation, many users remained dissatisfied, pointing out that previous accounts related to the Biden administration now exist as archived separate entities. "Why must I unfollow them multiple times? They keep being added back," one user questioned.

Another user argued that if Stone's explanation were true, the increase in followers should have been immediate. "If we rebranded our organization, our followers would remain," they noted. However, for the President's account, they observed a gradual increase in followers throughout the day.

Additionally, there were calls for more transparent communication. "This needs to be clarified within these Facebook pages," one comment demanded, suggesting an info modal to address the recent policy changes.

Hashtag Controversy

Responding to the issue of blocked hashtags, Stone noted that the problem was not limited to political hashtags. "We are experiencing an issue affecting the ability to search for various hashtags on Instagram," Stone assured, "and we are working swiftly to resolve it."

These developments occur alongside Meta's recent changes to its content policy. Mark Zuckerberg, chairman of Meta, announced that the company would cease using third-party fact-checkers. Instead, a community notes system similar to that of X will be implemented. This change aims to "restore free expression," explained Zuckerberg.

However, this policy shift has raised concerns within the LGBTQ+ community. The updated hateful content policy now permits certain allegations of mental illness based on gender or sexual orientation, citing political and religious debates on topics like transgenderism and homosexuality.

Furthermore, Meta has rolled back initiatives related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. This includes the removal of Pride and LGBTQ+ themes from its Messenger app, sparking further outcry from advocates for these communities.

Meta, when contacted for comment, reiterated Andy Stone's previous statements on X. He later expanded on Threads, a Meta-owned platform, clarifying that users were not forced to follow official government accounts. "These accounts are managed by the White House, and with each new administration, the content changes," Stone reiterated. "Follow and unfollow requests may take time to process as these accounts transition."

The controversy continues to unfold as Meta seeks to navigate these complex issues amid a challenging landscape of social media governance and user trust.

Author

Rutger

Like
Bookmark
Comment

Related Posts

Honoring the Past: U.K. to Memorialize LGBTQ+ Veterans Affected by Military Ban

The United Kingdom is taking significant steps to honor LGBTQ+ veterans who faced persecution and were discharged under the nation's former ban on queer military personnel. This ban, which lasted from 1967 until its repeal in 2000, caused immense harm to countless service members who were forced out of the military simply because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. In recognition of th [...]

Breaking News: Controversial Deadline Announced for Trans Military Personnel

In a recent and highly controversial move, the current administration has issued a directive affecting transgender individuals serving in the military. The directive specifies that transgender service members have until March 26 to make a crucial decision concerning their continued service in the Air Force. Background and Context This decision follows a series of policy changes over the past few [...]

Gender-Affirming Care Linked to Improved HIV Outcomes in Transgender Individuals

Recent research has highlighted the significant benefits of gender-affirming care for transgender individuals, particularly in relation to HIV outcomes. This groundbreaking study, published in the prestigious journal The Lancet HIV, analyzed data from over eight thousand transgender adults across different gender identities, racial backgrounds, and insurance statuses, spanning the years from 2013 [...]

Want to write an article or get interviewed?